Efektywność gracza
Szczegółowe statystyki na kartach
Zespół | Nazwa gracza | Zabić | ADR | Zgony | K/D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
fnatic | |||||
6 16 | |||||
Natus Vincere |
Zespół | Nazwa gracza | Zabić | ADR | Zgony | K/D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
fnatic | |||||
16 14 | |||||
Natus Vincere |
Zespół | Nazwa gracza | Zabić | ADR | Zgony | K/D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
fnatic | |||||
16 6 | |||||
Natus Vincere |
Zespół | Nazwa gracza | Zabić | ADR | Zgony | K/D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
fnatic | |||||
14 16 | |||||
Natus Vincere |
Prognozy analityków CSGO-FORECAST
So, that's the long-awaited final. Both teams showed a good result. In all his previous meetings Fnatic defeated Na'Vi. For me it was a bit surprising that the Na'Vi won EnVyUs and reached the final. While on the other The sides with EnVyUs now something's going on and they do not show such results, as DreamHack Cluj-Napoka. I noticed this interesting detail. Both teams let go of the net losers. Fnatic could not win EnVyUs, but not defeated Na'Vi TSM. But the next day Fnatic defeated TSM, and Na'Vi EnVyUs.
But as of this meeting, I believe in the victory of Fnatic. But the risk is, because you never know what will show Na'Vi