Statistiche dettagliate sulle carte
Le previsioni degli analisti CSGO-FORECAST
Both teams have played very well lately. This is especially true for NaVi. With the advent of the new coach, they did not predict anything good, but Andy proves that he is worthy to train the born to win. He changed the game beyond recognition and, I think, here Kinguin has no chance.
Frankly speaking, yesterday I was surprised by this result from the team from Poland: from 2: 0 against the top 2 (1) France Envyus, and it"s not just that Creek and the company did not play very well, Kinguin obviously raised their level of play, Although I did not expect that after the slump after the defeat from the team, the Poles showed that they can and want, so after yesterday"s match I have already revised for themselves their prospects.
As for Na"Vi, as I said before, they actually came out cool on StarSeries and showed, in my opinion, better shooting and, if not for Astralis, they could go on quietly, so they certainly remain favorites here.
Quite strange peaks, I expected another. The first card will be Mirage and I think it"s the one who"s going to kick it Na"Vi, and the second card will be Inferno and judging by how Natus Vincere played it on the StarSeries, and by the way Kinguin played yesterday, I think it"s just the peak of the guys from Poland .
I think Na"Vi will be able to select Mirage and it will probably be very sweaty, even close to the dopas. And on Inferno, it all depends on the Na"Vi game, if we see a good game on the first card, and if the Natus Vincere, they will win by shooting, then the Poles will not have a chance on the second card and there we can already see the score in the area - 16: 8, plus or minus of course.
Bet recommend 10-15% on Na"Vi on the first card, and on the second, as I said, judge for yourself by the game. And if Natus Vincere really "shoot" the opponent, then you can bet 15-20% of the bank and the second card. The risk is certainly big, but you yourself know that this is BO1 (2), and there is always a big risk.